HOME   ABOUT SCAN CALENDAR MEMBER LINKS BOARD OF DIRECTORS BECOME A MEMBER
HELPFUL DOCUMENTS LIBRARY OF LINKS JOB OPPORTUNITIES NATIONAL NATOA STAR AWARDS
COOL SITE OF THE MONTH  JOIN THE LIST SERVE E-MAIL US SEARCH THE SITE

NATOA JOURNAL

ARTICLE 2: I didn't know you did that: services to make your operation indispensable
by Brad Clark, Station Manager, Madison City Channel, City of Madison, WI

Raise your hands if your station came into existence as your community’s version of C-SPAN – if your raison d’etre was to be the channel through which residents could keep track of their local government through coverage of government meetings. Put your hands down now – that was unanimous!  Covering the meetings of local government is, indeed, Job One. But is “just” covering these meetings good enough anymore?  Is the “C-SPAN” model for our channels still the only or even the best way to provide value to the public?  And, perhaps more importantly in these days of tightening state and local budgets, can we afford to have meeting coverage be the only service we provide? 

No doubt for most of us, meeting coverage will likely remain the “meat and potatoes” of what we do, but since we are basically service organizations staffed by creative people, we can be – need to be – creative in the services we provide and in how we provide them.  The more services we can provide to other agencies and the public, the more valuable our organization; and, the more valuable, the less vulnerable we’ll be at budget-cutting time. 

How our channels are funded is an important first consideration in this discussion, because you obviously have to be able to afford, within your budget, to provide a service.  Regardless of how your operation is funded - by some combination of franchise fees and/or “PEG” fees, general fund (property tax) or other revenue - you’ll have to determine the affordability of new initiatives. That said, it’s quite likely that one of the first “additional services” many of us began providing was as a video production facility.  After all, we have the cameras and other equipment, and by producing public service announcements, training, recruitment and outreach videos, we’re helping other agencies disseminate information they deem important. 

There are, of course, some basic questions to ask in deciding how to provide this service.  One is technical – while the equipment used to cover a Council meeting can be similar to that  needed to create a recruitment tape for your Police Department, it’s not the same, so chances are you’ll have to decide if the investment in additional resources is possible and warranted.  In Madison we constantly promote ourselves as a production facility, with annual needs assessments, questionnaires, demo tapes, and other marketing tools. 

A second basic question is funding.  Who’s going to pay for the staff time to produce that video?  Are these dollars built into your budget (or could they be?) or are they part of the client agency’s budget?  To bill or not to bill – that is a big question.  Some channels, such as Los Angeles Cityview, have money set aside in their annual budgets for these types of productions, with different mechanisms in place to determine which projects get priority.  Others – and Madison falls into this category – bill the client for production services based on rates we’ve established.  This service therefore pays for itself and provides us with a revenue stream. 

This is a tricky area, this business of charging for services. To have real value, of course, services must be sustainable; people have to be able to expect that we’ll provide the service from one year to the next, and that of course is primarily a function of resources.  On the other hand, if other City agencies feel like you’re going to ask them for an account number for everything, they may be less inclined to call. 

A logical offshoot from being the video production facility can be as the City’s multimedia center.  Since we are the experts in TV and video, we can advise other City staff about TV equipment, assist others with their A/V needs, or provide basic training in simple camera or editing equipment operation.  In Madison, any agency’s potential video equipment purchase must get our OK, so that an agency doesn’t spend money on a TV/VCR unit when another agency has its own rarely-used unit collecting dust next door. 

In Rye, N. Y., James Kenny and staff, when requested, videotape public buildings and storm damage for insurance purposes.  So far these requests have been infrequent enough that the issue of staff time hasn’t come up. In Dayton, Ohio, Randy Bellinger and his staff routinely monitor and videotape “...local newscasts to keep abreast of how other local media are portraying the City.” Talk about sustainable!  In Louisville, Kentucky, staff have worked out an arrangement with the Kentucky Department of Transportation which nets them 2 hours each morning of real-time traffic camera views, complete with lower thirds identifying, say, eastbound I-65 traffic as “heavy” or “light” – at no cost to their station at all.   

Partnerships with other agencies can reduce or even eliminate the costs of providing services.  In Madison we’ve been streaming and archiving most of our regular programming for over two years.  By working with the folks from Information Services, we were able to present this initiative as simply another form of E-Government, so they purchased the needed equipment.  We were also able to incorporate streaming into our regular procedures so that it doesn’t add significant staff time to our efforts. Even when we “index” meetings (that is, identify items by agenda number so that people viewing a four hour Council meeting can go directly to the issue they’re interested in), we provide a million-dollar service without significant ongoing costs. 

Partnerships can also provide revenue.  Since another aspect of the modern “multimedia center” can be helping other agencies utilize the Internet, in addition to streaming our stuff, we also (for a small fee, equal to our dubbing rates) will digitize videos and link them onto agencies’ sites (links listed at the end of this article). Our I.S. Department is responsible for helping agencies create their web presence.  However, the folks in I.S. don’t have the background to create useful, easy-to-navigate and ADA-compliant sites, whereas our staff has experience in Bulletin Board and other graphic design.  So, when an agency contacts I.S. for help with their home page, they’re referred to us, to work with them to design and construct – for a fee, which is a small fraction of what these agencies would pay if they went to an outside vendor – their sites.  

We’ve also developed a relationship with the City’s Convention Center.  As events book space in the Center, they often want speeches taped, or sometimes just need a camera and operator to send the presentation to other rooms in the facility.  We bill the Center for our production time as per our rate card, and they pass the cost along to the client.  You know how we all always say we won’t do weddings?  Well, if the Center books a wedding and their client wants video – hey, we’ll take the business. 

And speaking of revenue sources – why limit your clientele to just the agencies within your unit of government?  We’ve produced videos for County agencies, nonprofit groups –even a local business or two.  We don’t market our services to the “for-profit” sector, even though there’s no legal reason why we couldn’t, simply because we want to avoid any possible ill-will of a nonprofit government agency (with its lower rates) competing with local for-profit businesses to produce commercials for Al’s Restaurant.  An inexpensive mention in the “Video Production” section of the local Yellow Pages nets us phone calls on a fairly steady basis.  In Torrance, California, Michael D. Smith and his staff have worked around this conflict by establishing two sets of rates – a lower version for public sector entities, and higher rates that more closely parallel those charged by commercial video houses for private businesses.   

In terms of services to the general public, few initiatives have as much immediate value as providing emergency information.  Contra Costa Television in California, in a community near a number of refineries and chemical plants, is part of a local system providing information on shelters in the case of hazardous materials spills.  In the past year their system (which doesn’t cost the station anything) has been triggered 3 or 4 times.  In St. Tammany Parish in Mandeville, Louisiana, Suzanne Parsons’ channel was kept busy in September of 2002 carrying road, building and event closure information as the area was rocked in back-to-back weeks by Hurricanes Isidore and Lili.  Similarly, Radnor Township in Pennsylvania carries regular updates of school and road closings. 

And of course let’s not forget good old meeting coverage itself!  There are many ways of enhancing the value of this service: 

            -Highlighting agenda items, perhaps with lower third CG or even a pre-meeting segment identifying the “big ticket” items on the agenda: 

            -Streaming and archiving meetings on the Internet (see Steve Toler’s article in this issue). 

            -Closed-captioning or signing of meetings for the hearing-impaired community (see Robin Gee and Darren Doerschel’s article in this issue). 

            -Interactivity - utilizing telephone or emails to allow citizen input into policymaking sessions such as Council meetings.  Although the technology exists, how or whether to use it is a policy issue for elected officials.  In Beverly Hills, California, viewers are invited to and routinely do call in during Council meetings; what’s more, Mayor Thomas S. Levyn includes a “Beverly Hills Historical Quiz” in each meeting, a trivia challenge which offers prizes to viewers for correct answers! 

            This also leads into other ways of making your programming available to citizens.  Besides streaming, who doesn’t have some sort of policy on providing dubs of your stuff (another potential revenue stream)?  How about making programming available at the library?  Residents of Northbrook, Illinois, have this option, thanks to Cheryl Fayne and her staff.  And who among us has never gotten a call from some intrepid producer looking for footage of our cities?  A stock footage library can bring in some revenue and/or lead to lots of “footage courtesy of...” credits. 

            The list is almost endless, and we don’t have the space here to cover all the possibilities, but here are a few more ideas that our colleagues are making happen: 

            -Most of us probably already run a character-generated bulletin board during off-hours or in between regularly scheduled programming; in these days of channel surfing, a frequently replayed PSA for a local non-profit will get seen

            -Since we are the place for viewers to turn for local government, shouldn’t we also be their choice for coverage of local politics?  Forums with candidates for local office (perhaps in conjunction with a group such as the League of Women Voters) can play an important role in a well-informed electorate; a debate carried on the Government Access channel may well be the public’s only chance to hear or see candidates before election day.  For the 2002 election, the Maui County Clerk’s office funded a series of voter education PSA’s produced by Judy Starbuck and her staff at Akaku; Maui Community Television.  And speaking of Election Day, many of us can partner with our Clerk’s office to provide official results throughout that important evening.           

-If you are already streaming programming or are working in a nonlinear editing environment, you can probably create DVDs or CD-ROMs. 

-There are also many ways stations like ours can work with public safety agencies.  Besides producing and as appropriate playing training videos and other materials (perhaps on a separate, scrambled channel devoted to such purposes), many of us can help with evidence videos, digitizing photos – perhaps even video arraignments.  Some such uses of technology can be expensive to start up, but you can make the case that if future budgets are likely to look even grimmer, a wise investment in technology today can realize budget savings for years to come. 

We’ve touched upon a number of services that somewhere or another, channels like ours are providing to their City staff and to their community.  Undoubtedly there are many more ideas we haven’t discussed.  It’s up to you to decide which services are most appropriate for your community and your budget, and to decide what partnerships can be pursued to bring your ideas to life. Coverage of meetings will probably always be the staple of our services and our programming. The more creativity we can demonstrate and value we can provide to fellow agencies and to the public, the more secure our futures regardless of budget constraints, and the more an integral part of our community’s interaction with its local government we will remain.

LINKS:
Links on Madison’s web site:

"Proper Handwashing Techniques" produced for Madison Public Health Dept"

Madison City Channel Production Rates

Indexed Madison Common Council meetings
 

Here are links to the channels mentioned in the article:

LA Cityview
Dayton, Ohio
Torrance, CA
Rye, NY
Mentor, Ohio
Akaku, Hawaii
Santa Monica, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Northbrook, IL
Contra Costa

back to NATOA Journal
1. Why Government Access?
by Sue Buske and Bunnie Riedel
2. I didn't know you did that: services to make your operation indispensable
by Brad Clark
3. Is anyone watching?
by Robin Gee with David Korte 
4. Generating Revenue for your government access channel
by Nancy Johnson
5. Is Commercial Speech Permitted on Government Access Channels?
by Neil Lehto 
6. Implementing Captioning on your government access channel
by Darren Doerschel
7. Spanish language programming for PEG channels
by Ramon Torres 
8. DC's VOD
by Darryl Anderson and Dan Westman 
9. Civic Media Build Social Capital: The Ethics of Government Access in
the Marketplace of Ideas

by Sean McLaughlin
   You are visitor number

Hit Counter

Copyright © 2016 SCAN NATOA, Inc., All rights reserved